The activities of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) in combating corruption and ensuring the financial security of European Union funds

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10945786

Keywords:

European Union funds, irregularities, control system for EU funds

Abstract

In EU legislation, fraud is defined as a deliberate infringement that causes – or is likely to cause – damage to the EU budget. The fight against fraud and any other illegal activity – such as corruption – affecting the EUʼs financial interests is a shared responsibility between the EU and the Member States. OLAF has been active in the protection of the EUʼs financial interests. Between 2014 and 2020, the Commission and Member States detected more than 4,000 potential fraud irregularities, some of which were referred to OLAF. The irregularities concerned EU financial support of almost €1.5 billion, 72% of which was related to EU cohesion policy. Managing authorities in the Member States are responsible for taking proportionate and effective action against fraud in this area, taking into account the risks identified. The national institutions managing EU funds work in cooperation with OLAF. Anti-fraud includes prevention, detection and response, including reporting of detected fraud cases and recovery of funds unduly paid). The proportion of detected fraud in relation to the amount of financial support provided under the cohesion policy for the period 2014-2020 ranged from 0% to 2.1%, depending on the Member State. Between 2014 and 2020, OLAF protected EU taxpayers' money to the tune of around €500 million, recommending the recovery of more than €400 million on average per year for the EU budget due to fraud and irregularities and securing a further million euros. OLAF has also stopped a number of smuggling, counterfeiting and customs fraud attempts. It also helped enforce EU trade defence measures and developed strategies to prevent and counter new forms of fraud. In particular years, it has also investigated allegations of misconduct by staff and members of the EU institutions. In subsequent years, OLAF has carried out more than 250 cases a year.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babuśka E, Internal audit in enterprise management, [in] Controlling and audit in improving management, ed. Winiarska K., Ed. Tax Office in Szczecin, Szczecin 2005.

Babuśka E., W. The concept of management control in the public finance sector. Scientific Journals of the University of Szczecin 669, Szczecin 2011.

Barcz J. Legal nature and structure of the EU. The concept of European Union law [in:] European Union law. Systemic issues, edited by J. Barcz, Ed. University of Warsaw, Warsaw 2006.

Barcz J., Kawecka-Wyrzykowska E., Michałowska-Gorywoda K. European integration in the light of the Treaty of Lisbon: economic aspects. Ed. PWE, Warsaw 2012.

Bradley J., Zaleski J., Assessment of the impact of the National Development Plan for 2004–2006 on the economy using the Hermin model, Gospodarka Narodowa 2004, no. 7–8

Commission Decision of 28 April 1999 establishing the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) (notified under document number SEC (1999) 802) (1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom) (OJ L 136, 31.05.1999).

Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communitiesʼ financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995).

Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11.11.1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communitiesʼ financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (OJ L 292, 15.11.1996).

Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96.

Court of Auditorsʼ Special Report No 1/2005.

Filipek A., EU funds. Commentary on Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. Financial perspective 2007 – 2013, Ed. CeDeWu Warszawa 2009.

Fill W. Budget of the European Union – rules of adoption and implementation. Thought Economic and Legal. 2005, No. 2.

Florkiewicz M., Practical and legal possibilities of cooperation between OLAF and the Prosecutor's Office in the scope of using materials collected by OLAF to initiate criminal proceedings and use them within the framework of criminal proceedings (in:) M. Hudzik, C. Nowak (ed.), Legal institutions and instruments in the fight against crime against the financial interests of the European Union – national law and a European perspective. Review of European Law, Warsaw 2003.

Friedmann B., The role and activities of the European Court of Auditors, State Audit 2004 (6).

Gray S. Tackling fraud and mismanagement in the European Union, Centre for European Reform. Working Paper, s.21.

Gruszczak, A., Grzelak, A. OLAF and the protection of the financial interests of the European Communities (in) F.Jasiński, K.Smoter (eds.) Area of Freedom, Security and Justice of the EU, Warsaw 2005, pp. 223–224.

Interinstitutional Agreement of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 25 May 1999 concerning internal investigations by OLAF, OJ L 136, 31.05.1999. L 136 of 31.05.1999.

Kalupa M. (ed.) Management, reporting, control, promotion and evaluation of projects co-financed by EU funds, Ed. PWN Warszawa 2008.

Kasprzyk K., Commentary on the legal acts of the European communities in the field of structural funds and the cohesion fund for the years 2007–2013, Ministry of Regional Development, Warsaw 2006.

Kasprzyk K., Commentary on the legal acts of the European communities in the field of structural funds and the cohesion fund for the years 2014–2020, Ministry of Regional Development, Warsaw 2014.

Kołcz B., The role of internal audit in ensuring the security of public finances in Poland, Political Science and Security Studies Journal, Vol. 4 No. 4 (2023), WSSG Przeworsk, 2023.

Krajewski S. Introduction and commentary [in:] Maastricht Treaty. Warsaw, Agencja SGK (1998). Schandler, Susan. “Charting a coursetowards successful euro adoption”. Finance and Development 41.2 (2004), pp. 29-33. Hobolt, Sara Binzer. Europe in question: Referendums on European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Kuc B., Control and controlling in management: trends, competences, instruments, Ed. SGH Warsaw 2002.

Kuś A, European Union law taking into account the Treaty of Lisbon, Lublin 2010.

Łacny J. Protection of the EUʼs financial interests – activities of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), PPE 2003, no. 2.

Łacny J., Protection of EU financial interests – activities of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), PPE 2003, no.2, p.5.

Łacny J., Protection of the financial interests of the European Union in the field of cohesion policy. Wolters Kluwer, 2010.

Pieróg J. Public procurement law. Comment, CH Beck, Warsaw 2013.

Popławska E., The principle of subsidiarity in the Maastricht and Amsterdam treaties, Ed. PWE, Warsaw 2000.

Regulation No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU, Euratom) of 11.09.2013.

Ricketts A., Galster J. Head angle and elevation in classroom environments: Implications for amplification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51.2 (2008).

S.de Moor, Transnational Investigations and the Judicial Follow-Up to the OLAF Inspection Reports under the Existing Cooperation Instruments (in:) J.A.E. Vervaele (ed.), European evidence warrant. Transnational Judicial Inquiries in the EU, Antwerpen – Intersentia, 2005.

Sieradzka M., Tender collusion in the light of public procurement law and competition law. CH Beck Publishing House, 2015.

Skwarka B., Olaf in the light of Community regulations, KP 2004, no. 2.

Srebro B. Protection of the financial interests of the European Union, Wolters Kluwer Publishers, Warsaw 2004, pp. 56–58.

Srebro B., Protection of the financial interests of the European Union (in) A. Górski, A. Sakowicz (eds.) Fighting crime in the European Union. Judicial and Police Cooperation in Criminal Matters. Wolters Kluwer Publishing House, Warsaw 2006, pp. 112–113.

Winiarska K., Internal audit. Ed. Difin, Warsaw 2007.

Wlaźlak K., Regional development as a task of public administration, Oficyna Wolters Kluwer Polska sp. z o.o. Warsaw 2010.

Zapotoczny G., Forgery of documents and modern protection against them. Studia Iuridica 46 (2006).

Zawłocka-Turno A., Tender collusion or lawful action? Problems at the intersection of competition law and public procurement law. Online Antitrust and Regulatory Quarterly 4.1 (2012).

Downloads


Abstract views: 110
Downloads: 66

Published

31-03-2024

How to Cite

Kołcz, B. (2024). The activities of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) in combating corruption and ensuring the financial security of European Union funds. Politics & Security, 8(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10945786

Issue

Section

ECONOMICS. FINANCE