THE ISRAELI SECURITY DOCTRINE ADAPTING WITHOUT ALTERING CORE PILLARS

Abstract

This theoretical paper explores the resilience and evolution of Israel’s national security doctrine, the Israeli Security Triad, arguing that its core pillars—deterrence, early warning, and decisive military victory—remain fundamentally intact despite recent conflicts and the rise of asymmetric warfare. Analyzing decades of historical events, military strategies, and geopolitical developments, the research focuses on how the doctrine has responded to both conventional and asymmetric threats. The findings indicate that while modern asymmetric challenges have prompted the adoption of new technologies, such as AI-powered early warning systems and missile defense, and the introduction of a fourth "defense" pillar, these represent adaptations to modern conflicts rather than an alteration of the original doctrine's core strategic principles. This study contributes to military doctrine theory by illustrating how states can integrate advanced technologies and adapt strategies to new forms of conflict without abandoning foundational principles, offering practical insights for military strategists on balancing innovation with established frameworks. The paper provides a fresh perspective on maintaining doctrinal integrity through flexible adaptation in the face of constant threats. Future research could explore similar doctrinal adaptations in other nations or the ongoing evolution of Israel’s fourth pillar, particularly concerning AI and cybersecurity.