REGIME TYPE AND NATIONAL SECURITY OUTCOMES IN NIGERIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MILITARY AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

Authors

  • Koffi Romeo Lawyerkeme Isaac Jasper Boro College of Education
  • Emmanuel Tamaramiebi Timidi School of General Studies, Nigeria Maritime University of Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54658/ps.28153324.2026.15.1.pp.46-60

Keywords:

National Security, Civil–Military Relations, Military Regimes, Democratic Governance, Nigeria

Abstract

This paper examines the correlation between the regime type and national security outcomes in Nigeria between 1966 and 2025 based on the Civil–Military Relations (CMR) Theory. It looks at the dynamics of security in military rule (19661999) and the democratic rule in the fourth republic (19992025), and compares and contrasts their effectiveness in responding to emerging threats. The qualitative research design is a comparative historical-based study, which relies on secondary and documentary sources, and the content and comparative techniques will be used to interpret the findings. The results reveal that military regimes were based on centralized government and coercive force, which allowed responding quickly to the crisis and creating a temporary stability, especially during the civil war. Yet, these achievements were diluted by weak institutions, oppression, politicization of security systems, and low levels of trust in the government. Democratic rule brought about institutional changes, civilian control and diversified security policies including non-kinetic and regional partnership. However, the continued presence of insurgency, banditry, and communal violence are indicative of structural weaknesses, inadequate coordination, and policy implementation weaknesses. The comparative analysis reveals that although military rule brought short-term stability, it was unsustainable, and the democratic regime offers a more sustainable system even with uneven performance. The research comes to the conclusion that effective national security relies not on regime type but on the institutional capacity, the quality of governance, and legitimacy. It advises the reinforcement of oversight mechanisms, intensifying security sector reform, giving primacy to human-centered strategies, and institutional effectiveness to deliver sustainable security outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abubakar, D. (2020). Boko Haram and Islamic extremists. In C. Varin (Ed.), Security in Nigeria: Contemporary threats and responses (pp. 159–180). I.B. Tauris. (3), 245–260.

Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED). (2025). ACLED conflict data for Nigeria. https://acleddata.com

Adebajo, A. (2011). UN peacekeeping in Africa: From the Suez crisis to the Sudan conflicts. Lynne Rienner.

Agyeman-Duah, B. (2002). Civil-military relations in Ghana’s Fourth Republic. Critical Perspectives, 8, 1–30.

Adekanye, B. (1993). Military occupation and social stratification. African Development, 18(3), 7–31.

Akran, V. S. (2017). Transition to civil rule programmes in Nigeria 1966-1999: How sincere and committed were the military rulers? European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 2(7), 264–278.

Amnesty International. (2015). Nigeria: Counter-terrorism and human rights. Amnesty International Publications

Ayoob, M. (1995). The Third World security predicament. Lynne Rienner.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Croissant, A., & Kuehn, D. (2017). Civilian control of the military and democracy. Democratization, 24(2), 253–272.

Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.

Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141–155.

Dudley, B. J. (1982). An introduction to Nigerian government and politics. Macmillan.

Falola, T., & Heaton, M. M. (2008). A history of Nigeria. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808801

Freedom House. (2023). Freedom in the world 2023: Marking 50 years in the struggle for democracy. Freedom House.

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.

Grimm, S., & Merkel, W. (2008). War and democratization: Legality, legitimacy and effectiveness. Democratization, 15(3), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340801991072

Hills, A. (2012). Police reform in Nigeria. Journal of Modern African Studies, 50(4), 739–763.

Huntington, S. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.

Janowitz, M. (1960). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. Free Press.

Hutchful, E., & Bathily, A. (1998). The military and militarism in Africa. CODESRIA.

Hutchful, E. (1997). Military and police reforms in Ghana. Journal of Modern African Studies, 35(2), 251–275.

International Crisis Group. (2020). Violence in Nigeria’s North West: Rolling back the mayhem. International Crisis Group.

International IDEA. (2022). Global state of democracy report 2022: Forging social contracts in a time of discontent. International IDEA.

Joseph, R. A. (1987). Democracy and prebendal politics in Nigeria: The rise and fall of the Second Republic. Cambridge University Press.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2020). The new competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 51–65.

Lewis, P. (2007). Growing apart: Oil, politics, and economic change in Indonesia and Nigeria. University of Michigan Press.

Lührmann, A., Tannenberg, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2018). Regimes of the world (RoW): Opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 60–77.

Madiebo, A. A. (1980). The Nigerian revolution and the Biafran war. Fourth Dimension Publishers.

Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.

Milstein, B. (2021). Security and democratic equality. Contemporary Political Theory, 20(4), 836–857. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00446-w

Mustapha, A. R., & Ehrhardt, D. (2018). Sects and social disorder: Muslim identities and conflict in Northern Nigeria. James Currey.

OECD. (2020). States of fragility 2020. OECD Publishing.

Singh, N. (2014). Seizing power: The strategic logic of military coups. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Omede, A. J. (2011). Nigeria: Analysing the security challenges of the Goodluck Jonathan administration. Canadian Social Science, 7(5), 90–102.

Onuoha, F. (2014). Why Boko Haram is difficult to defeat. African Security, 7(3), 159–177.

Osaghae, E. (1998). Crippled giant: Nigeria since independence. Indiana University Press.

Osaghae, E. (2005). State failure and ethnic conflict in Nigeria. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 23(1), 1–17.

Powell, J. M., & Thyne, C. L. (2011). Global instances of coups from 1950 to 2010: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 48(2), 249–259.

Owen, O. (2013). The Nigerian military and the state: Civil-military relations in Nigeria. Routledge.

Siollun, M. (2009). Oil, politics and violence: Nigeria’s military coup culture (1966–1976). Algora Publishing.

Suberu, R. T. (2007). Nigeria’s muddled elections. Journal of Democracy, 18(4), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2007.0063

United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Human development report 2021/2022: Uncertain times, unsettled lives. UNDP.

United Nations. (2020). World public sector report 2020: Effective governance for sustainable development. United Nations.

Varieties of Democracy Institute. (2023). Democracy report 2023: Defiance in the face of autocratization. V-Dem Institute.

Williams, P. (2017). Fighting Boko Haram. African Affairs, 116(463), 1–23.

World Economic Forum. (2023). Global risks report 2023. World Economic Forum.

Downloads

Published

01-04-2026

Issue

Section

General

How to Cite

REGIME TYPE AND NATIONAL SECURITY OUTCOMES IN NIGERIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MILITARY AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE. (2026). Politics & Security, 15(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.54658/ps.28153324.2026.15.1.pp.46-60