PARLIAMENTARY INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT AND THE CHALLENGES OF ENHANCED EU INFORMATION SHARING: THE CASE OF BULGARIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54658/ps.28153324.2026.16.2.pp.33-42Keywords:
parliamentary control, intelligence oversight, national security, information sharing, democratic accountability European Union, BulgariaAbstract
Global trends and the ongoing dynamic processes of trans-border security threats necessitate an unprecedented intensification of intelligence sharing among European Union (EU) Member States, which also reflects on the strengthening of parliamentary oversight of intelligence services. These changes require the application of an integral approach to understanding potential risks and threats, in order to increase awareness and the effectiveness of parliamentary control over intelligence agencies. On one hand, enhanced cooperation in information exchange within the EU strengthens collective security, but simultaneously creates significant difficulties regarding the control and accountability of national intelligence services and institutions. This study demonstrates that overcoming these gaps can largely be achieved by increasing their effective monitoring and parliamentary oversight. This article aims to explore the models of parliamentary intelligence oversight and reveal the challenges they face under the conditions of intensive information exchange within the EU. A special focus is placed on Bulgarian parliamentary practice and its institutional framework. Through the case of Bulgaria, the article examines and reveals the paradoxes of parliamentary control in light of international obligations and requirements for democratic transparency. The research results indicate that current oversight models lag behind the networked nature of contemporary intelligence cooperation. Proposals are made to strengthen inter-parliamentary cooperation within the EU through information-sharing agreements.
Downloads
References
Activity report (2019-2024), LIBE, Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/285271/2019-2024%20LIBE%20Activity%20Report.pdf
Annex No. 1 to Art. 25 of the Protection of Classified Information Act (2002), lex.bg, https://www.lex.bg/laws/ldoc/2135448577
Bakalov, Y. I. (2022). Geopolitical Risks to the Security of Southeast Europe. Plovdiv: Publishing House VUSI, p. 58-72.
Bakalov, Y. I., & Bahchevanov, G. (2025). Yearbook (Vol. XXII, pp. 37–50). Academic Publishing House ANIS. https://www.anis.bg/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Годишник-АНИС-2025.pdf
Born H., Leigh I. (2005). Making Intelligence Accountable: Legal Standards and Best Practice for Oversight of Intelligence Agencies. Oslo edition from http://www.procon.bg/node/3930
Committee on Oversight of Security Services, Special Intelligence Means and Access to Data under the Electronic Communications Act (2017), National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria, https://www.parliament.bg/
bg/parliamentarycommittees/2596
Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria (1991), Art. 105(1), https://www.parliament.bg/bg/const
Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria (1991), Art. 62, https://www.parliament.bg/bg/const
Cybersecurity Act (2026). State Gazette, issue No. 17
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022, EUR-lex, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2555
European Security Strategy, (2009) https://www.consilium.europa.eu/
media/30803/qc7809568bgc.pdf
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2024), https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2025/consolidated-annual-activity-report-european-union-agency-fundamental-rights-2024
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2017). Surveillance by intelligence services: Fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU – Volume II: Field perspectives and legal update. Publications Office of the European Union. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2017/surveillance-intelligence-services-fundamental-rights-safeguards-and-remedies-eu
Ivanov, M.M. (2020). Intelligence Infrastructure. Pleven: Publishing House "Nima ", 282 p.
Management and Functioning of the National Security Protection System Act (2015), lex.bg, https://www.lex.bg/bg/laws/ldoc/2136588572
NATO Strategic Concept (2022), https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/
webready/documents/publications-and-reports/strategic-concepts/2022/290622-strategic-concept.pdf
Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector: Principles, Mechanisms and Practices (2003), Inter-Parliamentary Union, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces. Geneva, https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/129147/ipu_hb_bulgarian.pdf
Regulation (EU) 2022/991 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2022), EUR-lex, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/991/oj
Rules of Organization and Procedure of the National Assembly (2017), National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria, https://www.parliament.bg/
bg/rulesoftheorganisations
Stankov, V. H. (2024). Intelligence in the Security System. Plovdiv: Publishing Complex of VUSI, 110-114 p.
Stankov, V. H. (2025a). Intelligence through Technical Means. Plovdiv: Publishing Complex of VUSI, 161-180 p.
Stankov, V. H. (2025b). Control and Accountability in Intelligence. Plovdiv: Publishing Complex of VUSI, 204 p.
Updated National Security Strategy of the Republic of Bulgaria, Adopted by a Decision of the National Assembly on 14.03.2018, publ. State Gazette, issue 26 of 23.03.2018
Wills, A., & Vermeulen, M. (2011). Parliamentary Oversight of Security and Intelligence Agencies in the European Union. European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, (64-67). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201109/20110927ATT27674/20110927ATT27674EN.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nelly Bencheva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

