Keywords
Croatia
Tourism sector ERM II
adoption of euro
How to Cite
Abstract
Bulgaria and particularly Croatia have an important tourism sec-tor. The prospective influence of ERM II membership and following adoption of the euro appears to be less examined as tourism is concerned. This research reveals additional evidence that positive spillover on tourist inflow should be expected in a larger scale than the Eurozone countries due to lowering transaction costs and providing transparency and sustainability of prices. However, this positive trends are influenced by the current Covid-19 pandemic situation that creates preferences for short range tourist destinations.
References
De Vita, G. The Long-run impact of exchange rate regimes on international tourism flows. – In: Tourism Management, Vol. 45, 2014, рp. 25-26.
Gil-Pareja, S., R. Llorca-Vivero, and J. A. Martínez-Serrano. The effect of EMU on tourism. – In: Review of International Economics, 2007, pр. 302-310.
Rudež, H. N. and Š. Bojnec. (2008). Impacts of the Euro on the Slovenian Tourism Industry. – In: Managing Global Transitions: International Research Journal, Vol. 6, 2008, pр. 445-460.
Santana-Gallego, M., F. Ledesma-Rodríguez, and J. Pérez Rodríguez. (2010). Exchange rate regimes and tourism. – In: Tourism Economics, 2010, pр. 25-42.
Santana-Gallego, M., F. Ledesma-Rodríguez, and J. Pérez Rodríguez. The euro effect: Tourism creation, tourism diversion and tourism potential within the European Union. – In: European Union Politics, Vol. 17, 2016, pр. 16-18.
Thompson, A., and H. Thompson. The exchange rate, euro switch and tourism revenue in Greece. – In: Tourism Economics, 2010, pр. 773-780.
Webber, A. Exchange rate volatility and cointegration in tourism demand. – In: Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2001, pр. 398-405.
WTTC, 2020. Annual Research Database.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 2021